Risk Analysis of Operation Igniter Technology System For Rocket Motor X

Widianto Nugroho, Hendrana Tjahjadi, Y.H Yogaswara, Evie Lestariana

Abstract

This study discusses risk assessment, and the results of the analysis on the ignition system used on the X rocket. The purpose of this study was to obtain a risk analysis obtained when operating the ignition system on the X rocket. This study used HIRADC (Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Determining Control) with a qualitative explanation. The results of the risk assessment in the X rocket motor testing process on the application of the ignition system, there are 10 risks in activities consisting of 8 activities that have a "low" risk level, while the other 2 have a "High" risk level. Caused by probability 1 and severity 4 which can result in device explosion as well as death of the user. The scope of the next assessment is instruments risk assessment, based on the research conducted, the results obtained from the risk assessment are 13 risks of instruments failure, consisting of 9 risks with a "low" risk value. Meanwhile, there are 2 "moderate" risks, namely a short circuit in the cable and the casing does not catch fire which can result in serious injury. Other sectors that have 2 high risk "High" are found to be at risk of not being grounded which can result in static electricity not going to ground, premature ignition during installation, explosion, which can cause death.

Keywords

Rocket, Ignition, Risk, Assessment.

Full Text:

PDF

References

ISO. (2008). International Standard ISO/IEC 15288 IEEE Std 15288-2008. 8, 14.

Alka Suri. (2020). Ignition System for Solid Rocket Motors Technology Focus. 28(1), 1–20.

Corradini, M. L., Zhu, C., Fan, L. S., & Jean, R. H. (2016). rocket propulsions elements. In Handbook of Fluid Dynamics: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19031-24

Damayanti, C. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Keselamatan Peluncuran Wahana Antariksa Dalam Rancangan Peraturan Pemerintah Tentang Penguasaan Teknologi Keantariksaan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 5(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v5i1.4

Emilia, V., Wilson, & Doaly, C. O. (2018). Analisis Potensi Bahaya Menggunakan Metode HIRADC Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Kecelakaan Kerja. 251–257.

FuÄík, J. (2017). Revolution in Military Affairs and Outer Space. International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION, 23(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2017-0016

INCOSE. (2006). Incose Systems Engineering Handbook Version 3.2.2 - A Guide For Life Cycle Processes and Activities. 376.

Kementerian Pertahanan RI. (2012). Permenhan, PENYELARASAN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL FORCE KOMPONEN UTAMA. 19(650), 4–35.

Lestariana, E. (2008). Squib Sebagai Sumbu Penyala Listrik. Jurnal Dirgantara, 9(2), 46–50. Retrieved from http://kliping.lapan.go.id/index.php/berita_dirgantara/article/view/233

lexy j moleong. (2017). metode penelitian kualitatif. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 5–24.

National Association of Rocketry. (2002). Organizational Statement of the NAR. 52302(800). Retrieved from http://www.nar.org/pdf/Organizational Statement of the NAR.pdf

Puji, N., Sumarsono, R., & Saptadi, S. (2019). Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (Fmea) Dan Bow Tie Analysis Untuk Mengetahui Risiko Pada Program Pesawat N219 (Studi Kasus Pt. Dirgantara Indonesia). Ejournal3.Undip.Ac.Id, 219. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/ieoj/article/view/24271

Sadraey, M. H. (2013). AIRCRAFT DESIGN Aerospace Series List Design and Analysis of Composite Structures: With applications to aerospace Structures.

Saputro, T., & Lombardo, D. (2021). Assessment and Determining Control Risk Control Method Using Hazard Identification , Risk. Jurnal Baut Dan Manufaktur, 03(1), 23–29.

Supriyanto, H. (2009). Igniter Roket LAPAN. Jurnal Dirgantara, 10(2), 8–12. Retrieved from http://kliping.lapan.go.id/index.php/berita_dirgantara/article/view/85

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30536/j.jtd.2022.v20.a3708

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.