THE EFFECT OF HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE UNIT ON CI RASEA WATERSHED STREAMFLOW BASED ON LANDSAT TM
Abstract
. This paper discusses spatial pattern of Hydrologic Response Unit (HRU), which is a unit formed of hydrological analysis, including geology and soil type, elevation and slope, and also land cover in 2009. This paper also discusses the impact of HRU on streamflow of Ci Rasea watershed, West Java. Ci Rasea watershed is located at the upstream part of Ci Tarum watersheds in West Java Province, Indonesia. This research used SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model to obtain spatial HRU and river flow. The method used Landsat TM data for land cover and daily rainfall for river flow modeling. The results have shown spatial pattern of HRU which was affected by land cover, soil type and slope. In 2009, accumulated surface runoff and streamflow changes were spatially affected by HRU changes. The large amount accumulation of river flow discharge happened in HRU with landcover paddy field, silty clay soil, and flat slope. While the low discharge of river flow happened in HRU with plantation, clay soil, and slightly steep slopes as HRU dominant. It was found that accumulation of surface runoff in Ci Rasea watershed can be reduced by changing the land cover type in some areas with clay and slightly steep slope to become plantation area and the areas with sandy loam soil and flat slope can be used for paddy fields. Beside affected by HRU, the river flow discharge was also affected by the distance of sub watershed to the outlet. By using NS model and statistical t-student for calibration and validation, it was obtained that the accuracy of river flow models with HRU was 70%. It meant that the model could better simulate water flows of the Ci Rasea watershed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adrionita, (2011), Thesis: Analisis Debit Sungai dengan Model SWAT pada Berbagai Penggunaan Lahan di DAS Citarum Hulu Jawa Barat. IPB, Bogor.
Ahl RS, Woods SW, Zuuring HR, (2008), Hydrologic calibration and validation of SWAT in a snow-dominated Rocky Mountain watershed, Montana, U.S.A. J. American Water Resour. Assoc. 44(6): 1411-1430.
Anderson MG, Burt TP, (1978), The Role of Topography in Controlling Throughflow Generation. Earth Surf. Processes and Landfornis 3: 331-344.
Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R., Williams JR, Haney EB, Neitsch SL, (2011), Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Document version 2009. Texas A & M University System. Texas.
Balitklimat, (2007), Analisis Perubahan Tutupan Lahan dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Neraca Air dan Sedimentasi Danau Tempe. http://balitklimat.litbang.deptan.go.id.
Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ, (1979), A Physically-Based Variable Contribution Area Model of Catchment Hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24(1): 43-69.
Briley L., (2010), Data Pre-Processing for SWAT. University of Michigan. Flint, USA.
Chubey MS, Harhout S., (2004), Integrasi of RADARSAT and GIS Modeling for Estimating Future Red River Flood Risk. Geo journal 59:237-246. Belanda.
Devito K., Creed I., Gan T., Mendoza C., Petrone R., Silins U., Smerdon B., (2005), A Framework for Broad-Scale Classification of Hydrologic Response Units on the Boreal Plain: is Topography the Last thing to Consider. Journal of Hydrology Process 19 (8): 1705–1714.
Fakhrudin M., (2003), Kajian Respon Hidrologi Akibat Perubahan Penggunaan Tanah di DAS Ciliwung. Bahan Seminar Program Pascasarjana IPB, Bogor.
Flugel WA, (1997), Combining GIS with Regional Hydrological Modeling using the Hydrological Response Unit (HRUs): An Application from Germany. Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 43 (3-6): 297-304.
Harto SBR, (1993), Analisis Hidrologi. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Hernandez M., Miller SN, Goodrich DC, Goff BF, Kepner WG, Edmonds CM, Jones KB, (2000), Modelling Runoff Response to Landcover and Rainfall Spatial Variability in Semi-Arid Watersheds. Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 64:285-298.
Issey JM, (2011), Bencana Banjir Bandung Selatan (Studi Kasus Kelurahan Baleendah Kabupaten Bandung). http://www.scribd. com/doc/58813499/Paper-Bencana-Banjir- Bandung-Selatan (3 Januari 2012).
Leon LF, George C., (2008), Water Base: SWAT in an Open Source GIS. The Open Hydrology Journal 1:19-24.
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, (2005), Soil and Water Assessment Tool: User’s Manual Version 2000. Agriculture Research Service and Texas Agriculture Experiment Station. Texas.
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, (2011), Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical Documentation version 2009. Agriculture Research Service and Texas Agriculture Experiment Station. Texas.
Park YS, Park JH, Jang WS, Ryu JC, Kang H., Choi J., Lim KJ, (2011), Hydrologic Response Unit Routing in SWAT to Simulate Effects of Vegetated Filter Strip for South-Korean Conditions Based on VFSMOD. Journal of Water 3: 819-842.
Pawitan H., (2002), Flood Hydrology and An Integdischarged Approach to Remedy the Jakarta Floods, International Conference on Urban Hydrology for the 21st Century. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Pawitan H., (2006), Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Hidrologi DAS. Bogor: Laboratorium Hidrometeorologi FMIPA, IPB.
Rodriguez-Iturbed I., Valdes JB, (1979), The Geomorphologic Structure of hydrologic Response. Journal of Water Resour. Res. 15(6): 1409-1420.
Suryani E., Fahmuddin A., (2005), Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Dampaknya terhadap Karakteristik Hidrologi: Studi Kasus DAS Cijalupang, Bandung, Jawa Barat. Prosiding Multifungsi Pertanian.
Yusuf SM, (2010), Thesis: Kajian Respon Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Terhadap Karakteristik Hidrologi pada DAS Cisarea Menggunakan Model MWSWAT. Sekolah Pasca sarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.