COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WING LIFT DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS USING NUMERICAL METHOD
Abstract
This research focuses on calculating the force distribution on the wings of the LSU 05-NG aircraft by several numerical methods. Analysis of the force distribution on the wing is important because the wing has a very important role in producing sufficient lift for the aircraft. The numerical methods used to calculate the lift force distribution on the wings are Computational Flow Dynamics (CFD), Lifting Line Theory, Vortex Lattice Method and 3D Panel Method. The numerical methods used will be compared with each other to determine the accuracy and time required to calculate wing lift distribution. Because CFDs produce more accurate estimates, CFD is used as the main comparison for the other three numerical methods. Based on calculations performed, 3D Panel Method has an accuracy that is close to CFD with a shorter time. 3D Panel Method requires 400 while CFD 1210 seconds with results that are not much different. While LLT and VLM have poor accuracy, however, shorter time is needed. Therefore to analyze the distribution of lift force on the wing it is enough to use the 3D Panel Method due to accurate results and shorter computing time.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson Jr, J. (2001). Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. In Fundamentals of aerodynamics. https://doi.org/10.1036/0072373350
Bertin, J. J., & Cummings, R. M. (2009). Aerodynamics for Engineers (5th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Budziak, K. (2015). Aerodynamic Analysis with Athena Vortex Lattice. 1–72.
Buzdiak, K. (2015). Aerodynamic Analysis with Athena Vortex Lattice (AVL). Hamburg: Hamburg University of Applied Sciences.
Carvalho, A. R. D., & Brito, P. P. de C. (2017). Nonlinear Lifting Line Implementation and Validation for Aerodynamic and Stability Analysis. The XXXVIII Iberian Latin-American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering. Florianpolis.
Choi, C., Yu, W., & Kwon, D. (2014). Comparison Between the CFD and Wind Tunnel Experiment for Tall Building with Various Corner Shapes Comparison between the CFD and Wind Tunnel Experiment for Tall Building with Various Corner Shapes. (May).
Deperrois, A. (2013). XFLR5 Analysis of foils and wings operating at low Reynolds numbers. Date Accessed: 12.01.2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-788-4
Fonseca, W. D. P., Pinheiro, E. M., & Arcos, I. S. V. (2018). Aerodynamics Investigation of Finite Wings by Lifting-line Models using the Track Method. Congresso Tecnico Cientifico Da Engenharia e Da Agronomia - CONTECC’2018. Maceio.
Fouad, N. S., Mahmoud, G. H., & Nasr, N. E. (2018). Comparative study of international codes wind loads and CFD results for low rise buildings. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 3623–3639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.11.023
Gryte, K., Hann, R., Alam, M., Rohac, J., Johansen, T. A., & Fossen, T. I. (2018). Aerodynamic Modeling of the Skywalker X8 Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, ICUAS 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2018.8453370
Küchemann, D. (1953). The Distribution of Lift over the Surface of Swept Wings. Aeronautical Quarterly, 4(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001925900000937
Loya, A., Maqsood, K., & Muhammad Duraid. (2018). Quantification of Aerodynamic Variables using Analytical Technique and Computational Fluid Dynamics. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 12(10), 991–997.
Melin, T. (2000). A vortex lattice MATLAB implementation for linear aerodynamic wing applications. Master Thesis, (Master Thesis). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24472.49923
Multhopp, H. (1955). Methods for Calculating the Lift Distribution of Wings (Subsonic Lifting-Surface Theory).
Panagiotou, P., Kaparos, P., Salpingidou, C., & Yakinthos, K. (2016). Aerodynamic design of a MALE UAV. Aerospace Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.12.033
Silitonga, F. Y., & Moelyadi, M. A. (2018). Comparative Study of Wing Lift Distribution Analysis for High Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) Unmaned Aerial Vehicle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1005(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1005/1/012036
Sivells, J. C., & Neelly, R. H. (1947). Method for Calculating Wing Characteristics by Lifting-line Theory using Nonlinear Section Lift Data.
Spall, R. E., Phillips, W. F., & Pincock, B. B. (2012). Comparison of Inviscid Flow Methods for Lift and Drag Calculations Over Thin-Sail Geometries. Volume 1: Symposia, Parts A and B, 1235. https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM2012-72045
Ugargol, R. B., & Ugargol, A. B. (2017). Design and Analysis of Winglet for Low Subsonic Speeds. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 3(1), 1–6.
Weber, J., Kirby, D. A., & Kettle, D. J. (1956). An Extension of Multhopp’s Method of Calculating the Spanwise Loading of Wing-Fuselage Combinations.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.